Barrie Trower, Physicist and former Military expert on Microwave Radiation
“As stated by University Researchers, Government Scientists and International Scientific Advisors; a minimum of 57.7% of schoolgirls exposed to low-level microwave radiation (Wi-fi) are at risk of suffering stillbirth, foetal abnormalities or genetically damaged children, when they give birth. Any genetic damage may pass to successive generations.” (source)
Additionally, in Big Business where no one goes to jail and the regulators are in bed with the corporations, they can hide inconvenient truths from the public, free from fear of prosecution (see Banksters).
Cherish the friend who tells you a harsh truth, wanting ten times more to tell you a loving lie. ~Robert Brault
In the previous TABU, ‘Your Mind, Their Control’, we covered serious issues relating to powers being used covertly to access our minds through the subliminal use of radio or microwave frequencies to sell products and possibly social engineer large groups of people (make us fear, have anxiety, be lethargic and unquestioning to the PTB, impulse shop, etc.) without the individual even knowing deliberate programming has taken place.
spectrum” alt=”electromagnetic spectrum” src=”https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/46AMTk8KXgL5jb9pxZxGsv89_RmvGVnG1nNNT-P-cdnvbGzmoueNCN50GXK7FmTWgNLzCq5iDrwUEc9LDPYbER5AIIWPWF4DY-CjwRgevEprcW_YyKsYO_iHun-zjB1QferRPaHdyNQUcUok1u5JlsJRNKctbiI=s0-d-e1-ft#http://www.inspirationgreen.com/assets/images/Blog_Images_April/sura_electromagnetic_spectrum.jpg” width=”660″ height=”165″ />
Just as a refresher course — electromagnetic radiation consists of an electrical field plus a magnetic field which each oscillate perpendicular to one another as they travel through space. Amplitude is the height or breath of the wave. As said above, frequency is the waves per specific time frame, usually seconds, from extremely low frequency radiation (ELF) which have longer wavelengths (longer wavelengths are measured in megahertz) up to short gamma rays where the wavelengths are extremely close together. Rays with shorter wavelengths can carry more information and more energy.
There are two factors to be aware of in regard to wireless technologies. There is the radiation between handset and base station and then there is the information-carrying radio wave (ICRW). Microwave radiation carries the voice/data information by means of modulations. Scientists are now observing that pulsed information transfer by microwaves triggers biological effects. (2) Even the lowest pulsed frequency might not be safe. Wireless technologies pulse radiation in an organized fashion and these pulses interfere with the various biochemical processes going on in the body. (2) Just as electromagnetic interference from wireless technologies interferes with an airplane’s or a hospital’s equipment — so too with our inner processes. We are electrochemical/electromagnetic creatures, as can be experienced when hooked up to a electroencephalogram (EEG, a test that measures and records the electrical activity of the brain) or an electrocardiogram (EKG or ECG, a test that checks for problems with the electrical activity of the heart).
. The amazing story of Dr. George Carlo’s team of blue ribbon panel experts in 1999 conducting the largest study ever for wifi radiation in cell phones FOR the communications industry and found significant radiation impacts, mostly affecting children. The results were buried by the Big Telecom Industry in 1999 so Dr. Carlo wrote a book about this coverup called: Cell Phones.
“George Carlo, PhD, JD, is an epidemiologist and medical scientist who, from 1993 to 1999, headed the first telecommunications industry-backed studies into the dangers of cell phone use. That program remains the largest in the history of the issue. But he ran afoul of the very industry that hired him when his work revealed preventable health hazards associated with cell phone use.
Today there are more than two billion cell phone users being exposed every day to the dangers of electromagnetic radiation (EMR)—dangers government regulators and the cell phone industry refuse to admit exist. Included are: genetic damage, brain dysfunction, brain tumors, and other conditions such as sleep disorders and headaches.1-9 The amount of time spent on the phone is irrelevant, according to Dr. Carlo, as the danger mechanism is triggered within seconds. Researchers say if there is a safe level of exposure to EMR, it’s so low that we can’t detect it.
The cell phone industry is fully aware of the dangers. In fact, enough scientific evidence exists that some companies’ service contracts prohibit suing the cell phone manufacturer or service provider, or joining a class action lawsuit. Still, the public is largely ignorant of the dangers, while the media regularly trumpets new studies showing cell phones are completely safe to use. Yet, Dr. Carlo points out, “None of those studies can prove safety, no matter how well they’re conducted or who’s conducting them.” What’s going on here? While the answer in itself is simplistic, how we got to this point is complex.” (source)
Here is another one…
In the report he found the following:
“As stated by University Researchers, Government Scientists and International Scientific Advisors; a minimum of 57.7% of schoolgirls exposed to low-level microwave radiation (Wi-fi) are at risk of suffering stillbirth, foetal abnormalities or genetically damaged children, when they give birth. Any genetic damage may pass to successive generations.”
Professor John R Goldsmith, International / Advisor Consultant for R.F. Communication, Epidemiology and Communications Sciences Advisor to the World Health Organisation, Military and University Advisor, Researcher; wrote concerning the low level exposure of microwave irradiation (below thermal level) incident upon women:
“Of the microwave-exposed women, 47.7% had miscarriages prior to the 7th week of pregnancy….”(1)
A distinction here must be made and a very important one: schoolgirls are not women. Schoolgirls are children and children are both neurologically and physiologically different from adults. A child’s brain tissue / bone marrow has different electrical conductivity properties than adults due to the higher water content (2) (this renders the Specific Absorption Rate obsolete). Children’s absorption of microwave radiation can be ten times higher than adults. Permanent low-level microwave exposure can induce chronic nitrosative and oxidative ‘stress’ thence, damage the cellular mitochondria (mitochondropathy). This ‘stress’ can cause irreversible mitochondrial DNA damage (mitochondrial DNA is ten times more susceptible to oxidative and nitrosative ‘stress’ than the DNA in the cell nucleus). Mitochondrial DNA is irreparable due to its low histone protein content, therefore any damage (genetic or otherwise) can be transmitted to all successive generations through the maternal line. (3)
Hence, we are subjecting each successive female generation to harm. Whether these two ten-fold increases ‘merge’ to become 57.7% or are additional, thence equal 67.7% of those to suffer, is a moot point. Either way we are facing the equivalent of a pandemic. I was invited to present a lecture at Brighton University recently and one Doctor commented on a +60% foetal birth rate damage from exposed farm animals. All mammalian species will of course suffer the same consequence resulting from low-level microwave irradiation. There is very little difference ‘biologically’ between our embryonic cells.
The problem is that these developing follicle cells do not have the cellular protection of mature adult cells. Consequently your ‘Grandchild’ may have had every single follicle cell irradiated and damaged prior to its conception. Therefore when your child becomes an adult (with its irradiated follicles) there is a greater likelihood of its child (your Grand-daughter) suffering the ailments previously mentioned, during conception / embryonic and foetal development stages.
The shocking truth is, not only was all of this known and documented long before wi-fi was ever put in front of children, but the dangerous biological effects were concealed (as they are to this day) from the general public, in order to protect the industries profit.
I invite the Reader to peruse my diagram and / or read my simple explanation concerning the microwaving of the ovarian follicles in schoolgirls. (source) and for a more detailed account of Mr. Trower’s lecture on the dangers of wifi on children and his body of work see here
Martha Herbert, PhD, MD of Harvard Medical School, a neurologist and neuroscientist who is also on the staff at Massachusetts General Hospital, cautions Los Angeles Unified School District on the use of WiFi in schools. (Source)
“Current technologies were designed and promulgated without taking account of biological impacts other than thermal impacts. We now know that there are a large array of impacts that have nothing to do with the heating of tissue. The claim from wifi proponents that the only concern is thermal impacts is now definitively outdated scientifically.”
“EMF/RFR from wifi and cell towers can exert a disorganizing effect on the ability to learn and remember, and can also be destabilizing to immune and metabolic function. This will make it harder for some children to learn, particularly those who are already having problems in the first place.”
“Powerful industrial entities have a vested interest in leading the public to believe that EMF/RFR, which we cannot see, taste or touch, is harmless, but this is not true. Please do the right and precautionary thing for our children. I urge you to step back from your intention to go wifi in the LAUSD, and instead opt for wired technologies, particularly for those subpopulations that are most sensitive.”
Dr. Herbert also directs the Cure Autism Now Foundation’s Brain Development Initiative and is the Co-Chair of the Environmental Health Advisory Board of the Autism Society of America. Her recent compilation of the science potentially associating EMF exposure with autism, a chapter in the recent BioInitiative Report, can be found here
Schools are now opting out of Wireless to get Wired around the globe:
(though there is no mention of Wifi, it fits with the overall timing of the buildout of the wireless network)
Researchers increasingly track variations in health outcomes across counties in the United States, but current ranking methods do not reflect changes in health outcomes over time. We examined trends in male and female mortality rates from 1992–96 to 2002–06 in 3,140 US counties. We found that female mortality rates increased in 42.8 percent of counties, while male mortality rates increased in only 3.4 percent. Several factors, including higher education levels, not being in the South or West, and low smoking rates, were associated with lower mortality rates. Medical care variables, such as proportions of primary care providers, were not associated with lower rates. These findings suggest that improving health outcomes across the United States will require increased public and private investment in the social and environmental determinants of health—beyond an exclusive focus on access to care or individual health behavior.
Using a laptop with the WiFi turned on may damage sperm, according to a landmark study on the effects of microwave radiation on sperm. The study was presented at the meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in Denver, Colorado.
“This is the first scientific study showing that a laptop computer connected by WiFi may damage DNA and decrease sperm mobility in only four hours,” said Conrado Avendano, Research Director at the Nascentis Reproductive Medical Centre in Argentina.
Previous studies on microwave radiation from cell phones found that the radiation from a cell phone can decrease sperm quality, and advised against men carrying cell phones in their pant pocket. This new study is the first to investigate the impact of microwave radiation from wifi-enabled laptops on sperm. In four hours of exposure, the scientists found decreased sperm motility and DNA damage.
In public schools across Canada, some children are reporting racing heart rates while in school. The Safe School Committee has received letters from parents who are frightened and confused. Their children are undergoing extensive medical testing but getting no answers from doctors. In Simcoe County, one young student was scheduled for exploratory heart surgery at Sick Children’s hospital in Toronto to find out why she was having heart problems. Once the girl was out of school for the summer, the symptoms disappeared and the surgery was cancelled.
A recent peer reviewed study in the European Journal of Oncology proved again that microwave radiation can alter people’s heart rate. An investigative news report on Global Television demonstrated these sudden changes at microwave radiation levels far below Health Canada`s Safety Code 6.
Click here for a Global News report demonstrating how people’s heart rate can change when exposed to microwave radiation from devices such as WiFi.
Click here for the most recent study proving low-level microwave radiation can affect the heart.
Click here to watch a video presentation of the study.
6 and 8 hertz. The wave frequency of the human
cavity resonates between 6 and 8 hertz. -Tesla” alt=”” src=”https://ci6.googleusercontent.com/proxy/RZkVkiwMYE_lzsHRtB7jjHi9gG5wiDY5Zg0m8mjMLdiUNQcH5GV0ki3pb6y0AwO8RAtaC5GHBrZXSBNWFjQFZbUZZZ9eR2vSWf03lcygetuksAjaEhTtXvVaEzk0-mv3kCLGcx-csa9JkpeNXC5QIal12vmnvrM4HS4u4xXgG70iwcI1IkTyFar0EhsjQIu0cGsMjEAhWEuRWooQQhjz8V7D_EhHfid5ilKfn2ISdwLVHOr2oPPq82hDxAKzVI9B_g0ZJmJ_dClNnVEWqBAvx1wilMtUrABWY68HJmPXresbdRRD6_ou9ws=s0-d-e1-ft#http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/%E2%80%9CAlpha-waves-in-the-human-brain-are-between-6-and-8-hertz.-The-wave-frequency-of-the-human-cavity-resonates-between-6-and-8-hertz.-Tesla.jpg” />
Current Safety Standards
The regulators of our health and safety as to the transmission of wireless energy waves has been given to globally acceptable standards by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protefction (ICNIRP) with full approval by our Federal Communications Commission (FCC). These standards do not even cover the long, low wave micro and radio frequencies except for the industry standard of if someone feels warmth from their laptop for over one hour they should stop. I kid you not. Additionally, microwave pulsed alternating current energy does not even heat (its not hot when you stick your hand in a microwave but is when put in an oven), so in effect there is no standard at all set for the safe use of wifi low magnetic frequency use!!!!
The ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) is responsible for monitoring and creating guidelines for radiation technologies. The ICNIRP guidelines focus exclusively on high frequency radiation and thermal activity. But many scientists have been pointing out that pulsed microwaves at low frequencies are also cause for alarm. Yet there are no guidelines for non-thermal, low-frequency radiation. In other words, the only tests performed for these technologies are thermal (testing whether the radiation can heat an object and cause harm due to that heating) or for frequency and height (if the wave length is high and close together radiation causes immediate harm). Gamma waves are high frequency as they are generated by radioactive atoms in nuclear explosions. So, heat and frequency/height are the only two criteria the commission tests for. (Source)
What our daily bath in WiFi radiation looks like if we could see it.
The Big WiLie; Has anyone asked “Is It Safe”???
The FCC, EPA, NIH and the International Governing bodies have refused to examine the plethora of medical and scientific evidence showing that cellular destruction of our bodies is being caused by low magnetic frequencies, not heat and not by higher frequency waves. It is the canary in the coal mine that
Thus, with the new ‘safety level’, effects were recognized only if they showed ‘heating’ or ‘thermal effects’ This is the stance of Big Telecom, Military, Industry etc. Heating does occur at much higher levels than what a cell phone etc. can typically cause you to notice. However, heating still occurs at low levels as cells are being oscillated back and forth millions or billions of times per second, from multiple devices at multiple frequencies, 24/7. Even if heat is not detectable at all, you are causing great destruction.
The stance of advocates against this technology, science, the laws of electricity and physics say we are vulnerable at levels far below ‘thermal effects’, this being called ‘non-thermal’. That is your controversy right there explained. They say nothing happens until you heat up, ‘we’ say you are disrupting every cell, frequency, signal and nerves of the body.
Remember admitting this would instantly hold the military and telecoms accountable for untold numbers of deaths and diseases that have occurred. Liability is being avoided for the sake of profit, which in the end is the true driver of this technology.
Federal Communications Comission (FCC) Health Non-Standards
The FCC completely punts any question of health safety on LMF transmissions and defers to privately funded agencies and corporate lobbyist organizations to monitor any effects:
“While there is no federally developed national standard for safe levels of exposure to radiofrequency (RF) energy, many federal agencies have addressed this important issue. In addition to the Federal Communications Commission, federal health and safety agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have been actively involved in monitoring and investigating issues related to RF exposure. For example, the FDA has issued guidelines for safe RF emission levels from microwave ovens, and it continues to monitor exposure issues related to the use of certain RF devices such as cellular telephones. NIOSH conducts investigations and health hazard assessments related to occupational RF exposure.
Federal, state and local government agencies and other organizations have generally relied on RF exposure standards developed by expert non-government organizations such as the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). Since 1996, the FCC has required that all wireless communications devices sold in the United States meet its minimum guidelines for safe human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) energy. The FCC’s guidelines and rules regarding RF exposure are based upon standards developed by IEEE and NCRP and input from other federal agencies, such as those listed above. These guidelines specify exposure limits for hand-held wireless devices in terms of the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). The SAR is a measure of the rate that RF energy is absorbed by the body. For exposure to RF energy from wireless devices, the allowable FCC SAR limit is 1.6 watts per kilogram (W/kg), as averaged over one gram of tissue.
Some health and safety interest groups have interpreted certain reports to suggest that wireless device use may be linked to cancer and other illnesses, posing potentially greater risks for children than adults. While these assertions have gained increased public attention, currently no scientific evidence establishes a causal link between wireless device use and cancer or other illnesses. Those evaluating the potential risks of using wireless devices agree that more and longer-term studies should explore whether there is a better basis for RF safety standards than is currently used. The FCC closely monitors all of these study results.However, at this time, there is no basis on which to establish a different safety threshold than our current requirements.(source).
Every organ of our bodies operate with their own polarized frequencies. Our brains, our hearts and our nervous systems all operate using magnetism and the electrical transfer of energy. Doctors attempt to bring someone back to life when their heart has stopped, athletes use biorhythmic pulses to help induce faster twitch muscle action and psychiatric hospitals use mental shock to alter brain waves in patients.
There is also pulsed frequencies, like what makes a heart beat and the continuous electrical flows which allow our operating system to stay within a certain range of frequency. Alter that frequency and the cells in our body begin to mutate and perform sporadically altering everything from our moods to our abilities to think and act clearly to our reproduction systems. Physics now tells us that if we can change either the magnetic field or the electrical field of the atom, we literally change that atom and its elements within our body.
Just last year San Francisco tried to be the first city to make cell phone manufacturers publish their radiation readings or Specific Absorption Rates (SAR) but in the 11th hour Big Wireless shut it down. (Note that they were not even talking about towers, just specific rates of radiated energy on individual cell and ‘smart’ phones.)
Earlier this year, the BioInitiative Working Group, a body of 29 independent scientists and health experts from 10 countries, launched a scathing attack on the inadequacy of the current standards. The report’s authors, re-iterating their position as published five years earlier, concluded, “The clear consensus of the BioInitiative Working Group members is that the existing public safety limits are inadequate for both ELF (extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields) and RF (radio frequency radiation).”
BioInitiative 2012 Report Issues New Warnings on Wireless and EMF
University at Albany, Rensselaer, New York / Embargoed until January 7, 2013
A new report by the BioInitiative Working Group 2012 says that evidence for risks to health has substantially increased since 2007 from electromagnetic fields and wireless technologies (radiofrequency radiation). The Report reviews over 1800 new scientific studies. Cell phone users, parents-to-be, young children and pregnant women are at particular risk.
There is a consistent pattern of increased risk for glioma (a malignant brain tumor) and acoustic neuroma with use of mobile and cordless phones” says Lennart Hardell, MD at Orebro University, Sweden. “Epidemiological evidence shows that radiofrequency should be classified as a human carcinogen. The existing FCC/IEE and ICNIRP public safety limits and reference levels are not adequate to protect public health.”
A dozen new studies link cell phone radiation to sperm damage. Even a cell phone in the pocket or on a belt may harm sperm DNA, result in misshapen sperm, and impair fertility in men. Laptop computers with wireless internet connections can damage DNA in sperm.
Based on strong evidence for vulnerable biology in autism, EMF/RFR can plausibly increase autism risk and symptoms.
While we aggressively investigate the links between autism disorders and wireless technologies, we should minimize wireless and EMF exposures for people with autism disorders, children of all ages, people planning a baby, and during pregnancy,” says Martha Herbert, MD, PhD.
Wireless devices such as phones and laptops used by pregnant women may alter brain development of the fetus. This has been linked in both animal and human studies to hyperactivity, learning and behavior problems.
According to David O. Carpenter, MD, and co-editor of the 2012 Report:
There is now much more evidence of risks to health affecting billions of people world-wide. The status quo is not acceptable in light of the evidence for harm.“
This study covers EMF from powerlines, electrical wiring, appliances and hand-held devices; and from wireless technologies (cell and cordless phones, cell towers, ‘smart meters’, WI-FI, wireless laptops, wireless routers, baby monitors, and other electronic devices). Health topics include damage to DNA and genes, effects on memory, learning, behavior, attention, sleep disruption, cancer and neurological diseases like Alzheimer’s disease. New safety standards are urgently needed for protection against EMF and wireless exposures that now appear everywhere in daily life.
The BioInitiative 2012 Report is available at: www.bioinitiative.org.Growing calls for improved wireless safety standards
A growing number of public health bodies are asking that the current wireless safety standards be reviewed. In 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO) classified radio frequency electromagnetic fields as a Group 2B possible carcinogen. Doctors groups are sounding the alarm. In its 2012 position paper, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine stated, “Multiple studies correlate RF exposure with diseases such as cancer, neurological disease, reproductive disorders, immune dysfunction, and electromagnetic hypersensitivity.”
Similarly, the International Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE) and Irish Doctors Environmental Association (IDEA) state that “there is sufficient scientific evidence to warrant more stringent controls on the level and distribution of electromagnetic radiation.”
themselves in aid of Breast Cancer Awareness” src=” with making big hunking football players, refs, et. al wear pink in a very violent sport of warriors watched by gazillions each week to be entertained …
..for the sole reason to ‘bring awareness’ to breast cancer’??, which everyone is already well aware of??
…yet hundreds of billions have been spent so far for ‘a cure’ by ACS, NHI, et. al over the past decades and cured nunca, nada, nothing…yet mass promo and marketing conintues unquestioned…where CNN Doctor Sanjay Gupta has come on TV saying, after further review, Hemp is curing many forms of cancer ???(source)
(We’ll know Big Sport is really on the side of ‘The Cure’ when all players are wearing Hemp leaves on their sleeves, cheerleaders costumes are made from hemp and 4″ hemp plants are distributed to all fans in attendance to ‘grow your own cure’ while Bob Marley is played aloud at every intermission)
cross” alt=”” src=”https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/Scu3rVEsmGpAQoebiQARkMVaugy1QQ3buduAlChYqipHzcsknhAgi-l_kpA_CDlRXOaP-pRcrt5l_MKJ1XIKFhojVONAHXavy9BRWD5g1bpfs5TZkJZ7XViXu5_agzF58pdRnOrWb1qlYtwna9SMT_2vCU4pUuQ=s0-d-e1-ft#http://twistedsifter.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/cell-phone-tower-disguised-as-a-church-cross.jpg” width=”315″ height=”420″ />
We have ever more powerful (more radiating) ‘smart’ cell phones on our person, wireless phones and wifi throughout our homes and office. Blue tooth wireless in our cars and even your keyless remote car and garage door opener’s that operate in these same frequency bands of long wave radio and micro waves. Most of these devices are always in search pulse mode sending out low magnetic waves.
“The new iPad boasts five antennas in all, two for cell reception, two for Wi-Fi/Bluetooth connectivity and one more for GPS. In fact, iFixit says Apple is using the whole LCD frame as an antenna.”
“Plans to use wireless technology to ease traffic congestion, regulate motorway speeds and monitor people’s personal health were set out on Wednesday by the broadcast regulator Ofcom. In a briefing, the Ofcom chief executive Ed Richards set out plans for the future use of radio spectrum, which he said was of “vital” importance to the UK economy, contributing an estimated £52 billion a year. Explaining that spectrum supply was under pressure from rising demand from smartphone and tablet use he outlined futuristic projects for maximising the resource. Over the next six months, partners including Microsoft, BT and Google are to take part in road-testing “white space” technology to exploit currently unused spaces in the broadcasting frequency band.
The rollout of smart meters proceeds alongside increased installation of wireless technology and cell phone towers in and around schools in the US. In 2010 Professor Magda Havas conducted a study of schools in 50 US state capitols and Washington DC to determine students’ potential exposure to nearby cell towers. A total 6,140 schools serving 2.3 million students were surveyed using the antennasearch.com database. Of these, 13% of the schools serving 299,000 students have a cell tower within a quarter mile of school grounds, and another 50% of the schools where 1,145,000 attend have a tower within a 0.6 mile radius. The installation of wireless networks and now smart meters on and around school properties further increases children’s RF exposure.
Many school districts that are strapped for cash in the face of state budget cuts are willing to ignore the abundance of scientific research on RF dangers and sign on with telecom companies to situate cell towers directly on school premises. Again, the FCC’s thermal effect rule is invoked to justify tower placement together with a disregard of the available studies.